Noreva, Executive Communication Consultancy

Case studies

Client work, written up properly

The first is published. More are being written.

Communication Partnership

Helping a senior leader communicate complex business performance with executive clarity

A senior leader presents sales performance and production volumes to stakeholders across international markets. Their expertise was never in question. The presentation buried it. This is how we turned technical reporting into executive communication, step by step through the Method.

Read the case study

Communication Audit

Helping a global consumer electronics brand present its trade fair strategy with greater executive impact

A global consumer electronics brand had a complete trade-fair strategy: booth design, product displays, visitor journey. The presentation described the changes but not the thinking behind them. This is how a Communication Audit turned it into clear, credible executive communication, step by step through the Method.

Read the case study

More case studies are being written, drawn from current and former clients across the range of the work: division executives leading international operations, and specialists turning deep expertise into a persuasive pitch.

Each one is written with the client, and published only with their permission. Where a client would rather not be named, the study is anonymised. That takes time, and I would rather do it properly than quickly.

Illustrative examples

The case studies above are real clients, shared with permission. The three below are illustrative. They are representative of the situations this work addresses, not specific clients, and they show how the Method applies across an Audit, an Intensive and a Partnership.

Communication Audit

From accurate to persuasive: a board presentation rebuilt

Senior manager · Manufacturing

The situation. A senior manager had one week to present a supplier-consolidation recommendation to the board. The deck was technically sound, but it buried the recommendation on the final slide, behind pages of background the board had not asked for.

How the Method applied

  • Intent Clarify that the board needed a clear yes or no on consolidating suppliers, not a history of the sourcing process.
  • Clarity Restructure the deck so the recommendation opened on slide one, with the detail organised beneath it.
  • Credibility Replace tentative phrasing with direct, ownership-based language.
  • Persuasion Reframe each supporting slide around the board’s likely concerns: cost risk and transition timeline.
  • Refinement A one-hour rehearsal focused on delivering the opening recommendation with authority rather than easing into it.
Instead of

“We were thinking maybe we could look at consolidating a couple of the suppliers, if that makes sense?”

Rewrite

“My recommendation is that we consolidate to two suppliers. The data shows this reduces cost by 14% without added delivery risk.”

The outcome. The board approved the recommendation in the same meeting, with no follow-up questions on the core proposal. Three earlier presentations on similar topics had ended in “let us take this offline”.

Presentation Intensive

Preparing a first-time investor pitch

Founder · Events technology

The situation. A first-time founder had six weeks until a Series A pitch for an events-booking app. The deck was built around product features, with little attention to what investors needed to hear: market size, traction and risk.

How the Method applied

  • Intent Reframe the goal of the pitch, not to explain features, but to move investors to a follow-up meeting.
  • Clarity Simplify the narrative into a clear arc, problem, solution, traction, ask, cutting detail that was not decision-relevant.
  • Credibility Shift founder language from hedged to grounded and specific.
  • Persuasion Restructure around investor psychology, leading with traction and market size before the ask.
  • Refinement A full rehearsal simulating investor pushback on unit economics and customer acquisition cost.
Instead of

“We hope to grow quite a bit over the next year, if things go well.”

Rewrite

“We have grown 40% quarter over quarter for the last three quarters, and our pipeline supports the same trajectory through next year.”

The outcome. The founder secured follow-up meetings with two of the three investors, with feedback that the pitch was clear and confident. An earlier attempt had stalled after the first meeting.

Communication Partnership

Building weekly communication confidence over six months

Engineering lead · Software

The situation. A technically respected engineering lead consistently spoke last, or not at all, in leadership meetings held in English, and routed his own status updates through a colleague rather than writing them himself.

How the Method applied

  • Intent Identify the real recurring goal: contributing a clear technical recommendation in real time, not just in writing afterwards.
  • Clarity Compress technical explanations into two or three sentences for a leadership audience, adding detail only if asked.
  • Credibility Shift written updates from passive, hedged phrasing to direct, ownership-based statements.
  • Persuasion Frame technical recommendations around business impact, cost, timeline and risk, so leaders could act quickly.
  • Refinement Each month’s sessions used real upcoming meetings, rehearsing moments to speak up beforehand and reviewing them afterwards.
Instead of

“It was sort of thought that maybe the deployment could possibly be delayed a little.”

Rewrite

“The deployment will be delayed by four days. This is due to a dependency issue we identified on Tuesday, and it does not affect the launch date.”

The outcome. After six months he was leading a recurring segment of the weekly leadership call himself, and his status updates took one draft instead of three, no longer going through a colleague first.

In the meantime

If you are weighing up whether this work is right for you, these are the most useful places to look.

Prepare for the moments that matter most.

Book a free consultation

15–30 minutes. English or German. Online worldwide.